Court No. - 55
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33218 of 2018 Petitioner :- Susheel Kumar Gupta Respondent :- State Of U P And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- In Person Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Brij Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.
Heard Sri Susheel Kumar Gupta; the petitioner in person, Sri Hareram Tripathi, learned brief holder for the State respondents and Sri Ajay Kumar Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Sri Brij Kumar Yadav, learned counsel representing respondent no. 5.
By means of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner wants an appropriate direction to the respondents, which in our considered opinion would be an order for demarcation of land of the petitioner.
Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 provides for a detail procedure to be followed in demarcation of the land covered by the said code. The petitioner has also made reference to Section 24 of the Revenue Code in this petition and further that the petitioner, who is lawyer also understands the code.
Therefore, in our considered opinion, it would be appropriate to the petitioner to move an application under Section 24 of the 2006 Code before the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievances.
Accordingly, we dispose off the writ petition leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the proper authority along with proper application under Section 24 of the Revenue Code, 2006, which may be dealt with and decided strictly in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within the time frame as prescribed under the code itself.
Order Date :- 23.1.2019 Pkb/