Sureshchandra vs Mitaben

Heard learned advocate for the petitioner.

No one appears for the respondent.

In view of what is recorded in order dated 05.05.2011 passed by this Court; judgment rendered in the H.M.P. No. 49/2009 [Old No. 66/2006]; and direction contained in order dated 22.02.2011 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Letters Patent Appeal No.238 of 2011, issue Rule.

Ad-interim granted earlier to continue as interim relief till final disposal of the petition.

[Anant S. Dave, J.] *pvv Top