Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Surendra Yadav vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 52
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7177 of 2019 Applicant :- Surendra Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Dubey,Pankaj Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the Charge-sheet No.132 of 2016 dated 19.9.2016 as well as the order of cognizance dated 16.11.2016 and the Non-bailable warrant dated 06.1.2019, under Sections 332, 353, 504, 506, 427 I.P.C., arising out of Case Crime No. 1090 of 2016, P.S. Kotwali Katra, District- Mirzapur, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mirzapur.
At the very out-set learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that he does not want to press the principal prayers seeking quashing of the charge sheet as well as order of cognizance and non- bailable warrant as have been made in the application nor is inclined to press the prayer seeking stay of the proceedings. He is ready to submit to the jurisdiction of the court, seek bail and accept all the conditions which this Court may deem fit to impose upon him. The only prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant is that the hearing of the bail application may be done on the same day.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant, the application so far as it relates to seeking quashing of the charge sheet as well as order of cognizance and non-bailable warrant and so far as it relates to seeking stay of the proceeding, stands dismissed.
However, it is directed that if the applicant appears and surrenders before the court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.
For a period of 30 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. However, in case, the applicant does not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against him.
With the aforesaid observations, this application is finally disposed off.
Order Date :- 25.2.2019 Vikas
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Surendra Yadav vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 February, 2019
Judges
  • Rajul Bhargava
Advocates
  • Sushil Kumar Dubey Pankaj Sharma