Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Surendra Nath vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 November, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 38319 of 2018 Petitioner :- Surendra Nath Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents.
By means of this writ petition the petitioner claims that pursuant to a road widening project, his land has been acquired but compensation has not been paid to him.
In case, the petitioner has a clear title over the land and such land has been taken over for widening of road in public interest, then the petitioner would be entitled to compensation. The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department is stated to be the appropriate authority to look into the grievance of the petitioner.
The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the Executive Engineer-respondent no.3 that in case the petitioner's land has been acquired for widening of the road and the petitioner has a clear title over the land, his claim for compensation, be considered and appropriate orders be passed in accordance with law, as far as possible, within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is presented before the authority concerned.
Order Date :- 26.11.2018 SKM
(Vivek Varma,J.) (Abhinava Upadhya,J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Surendra Nath vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 November, 2018
Judges
  • Abhinava Upadhya
Advocates
  • Rajesh Kumar Tiwari