Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Surendra Nath Mishra vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|11 October, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4143 of 2005 Petitioner :- Surendra Nath Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of petitioner.
2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought the following reliefs:
“(a) Issue a writ order or direction in nature of mandamus directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to work and get salary in accordance with law up to the age of 62 years that is 22.2.2007.
(b) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay salary to the petitioner admissible to the post of class IV up to the age of 62 years.”
3. However, I have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or that petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 11.10.2018 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Surendra Nath Mishra vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
11 October, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Pankaj Kumar Srivastava