Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Suresh vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8289 of 2019 Applicant :- Suresh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhanshu Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This bail application has been filed by the applicant Suresh seeking bail in Case Crime No. 924 of 2018, under Sections 147, 452, 323, 324, 379, 504, 506 IPC, P.S.Shikohabad, District Firozabad.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that as many as seven persons are said to have entered into the house and assaulted the victim Rajesh due to which he suffered injuries on his leg, elbow and back of chest. The supplementary injury report of the victim shows that he suffered fracture of shaft tibia and fibula bone. Learned counsel for the applicant has next submitted that the author of the said injury is stated to be the co-accused, Lalu and other injuries are simple in nature.
It is lastly submitted that the applicant has no other criminal history to his credit and the applicant is in jail since 21.12.2018 and in case the applicant is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial..
Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.
Let the applicant Suresh be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity.
(ii) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iv) The applicant shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, it will be open to the opposite parties to approach the Court for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 26.2.2019 R
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Suresh vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 February, 2019
Judges
  • Rajiv Gupta
Advocates
  • Sudhanshu Kumar Singh