Hon'ble Yogendra Kumar Sangal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Government Advocate.
Under challenge in the instant writ petition is FIR relating to Case Crime No. 1 of 2010, under Sections 307, 323, 352 IPC, police station Sarojini Nagar, district Lucknow.
We have gone through the contents of the FIR, injury report of the petitioner as well as injury report of respondent No. 5 (Sunil Lodhi) produced by learned Additional Government Advocate.
Admittedly the incident has taken place but in what manner the same has taken place is subject matter of investigation. Since the FIR discloses commission of cognizable offence, the same cannot be quashed.
The writ petition is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. However, it is provided that if the petitioners surrender and move application for bail, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously by the courts below.
Order Date :- 11.1.2010 Pradeep/-