Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Suresh Chandra Verma vs M D U P S R T C U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 92
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5867 of 2006 Petitioner :- Suresh Chandra Verma Respondent :- M.D. U.P.S.R.T.C. U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- V.D. Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- Sunita Agarwal,U.S. Singh Visen
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of petitioner to press this writ petition.
However, Sri U.S. Singh Visen, learned counsel for the respondents is present. He states that the present writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
However, I grant liberty to the petitioner to move the Court with an appropriate application in the event of cause of action survives.
Order Date :- 28.11.2019 Ajeet
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Suresh Chandra Verma vs M D U P S R T C U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 November, 2019
Judges
  • Vivek Varma
Advocates
  • V D Dubey