Hon'ble Rajesh Chandra,J.
Heard Sri B.P. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the State.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner is not the borrower and as such, his property cannot be dealt with in respect of the recovery under the Secularisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
Sri Prashant Singh, learned advocate holding brief of Sri Neeraj Tripathi, advocate is present for the Respondent, who submits that Section 17 of the said Act permits filing of the appeal.
Submission of the petitioner that he has not taken the loan and he is not the borrower and somebody has played fraud in respect of the property of the petitioner are the question of fact, which may not be attended here and thus he is to take recourse as permitted in law.
With this observation, this petition is disposed of finally. Order Date : 29.6.2010 n.u.