Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Surati Devi And Another vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 86
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6627 of 2004 Applicant :- Smt. Surati Devi And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- L.S. Yadav,Dinesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Dinesh Pathak,M.A. Khan
Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
None is present on behalf of applicants to press restoration application, though names of Sri L.S. Yadav and Sri Dinesh Pratap Singh have been shown in the list. However, Sri M.A. Khan, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 is present and requested that restoration application has unnecessarily been filed, though the revision was already decided by the sessions judge. Thus, applicants are unnecessarily abusing the process of law.
Under the circumstances, the restoration application is rejected for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 26.10.2021 MN/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Surati Devi And Another vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 October, 2021
Judges
  • Umesh Kumar
Advocates
  • L S Yadav Dinesh Pratap Singh