Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Surat vs State Of Up And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7456 of 2018 Petitioner :- Surat Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Madan Mohan Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.
Heard Sri Madan Mohan Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Shukla, the learned Standing Counsel.
This writ petition is preferred for seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent no.2 / S.D.M, Mehnagar, Tehsil- Mehnagar, District Azamgarh to decide Case of the petitioner under Section 101 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Surat Vs. State of U.P.), within a stipulated period.
The learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petition pending, it be disposed of by giving appropriate direction to the authority concerned.
The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent no.2 / S.D.M, Mehnagar, Tehsil- Mehnagar, District Azamgarh to decide Case of the petitioner under Section 101 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Surat Vs. State of U.P.), as expeditiously as possible, preferably within 3 months from the date of production of certified copy of the order.
It is clarified that the proceedings as far as possible should not be repeatedly adjourned, merely on the ground that the Presiding Officer is busy in administrative work.
Order Date :- 26.2.2018 RS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Surat vs State Of Up And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 February, 2018
Judges
  • Pankaj Naqvi
Advocates
  • Madan Mohan Srivastava