Supreme Court Decisions/Judgements Directory

Judges: Shivaraj V Patil, D M Dharmadhikari

28 November, 2003·J U D G M E N T SHIVARAJ V. PATIL J.Kanpur Development Authority (KDA) has filed these appeals challenging the correctness and validity of the common order dated 21.5.1997 made by the Division Bench of the High court in Writ Petitions.Three schemes were floated by KDA in September, 1978 with financi...

Judges: S Rajendra Babu, G P Mathur

28 November, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 5618 of 2000 Appeal (civil) 5172 of 2001 PETITIONER:M.P.A.I.T. Permit Owners Assn. & Anr.RESPONDENT:State of Madhya Pradesh DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/11/2003 BENCH:S. RAJENDRA BABU & G.P.MATHUR.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T RAJENDRA BABU, J. :A batch of writ petitions was filed before ...

Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat

28 November, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 14178-14184 of 1996 PETITIONER:Brij Behari Sahai (Dead) through L.Rs., etc. etc.RESPONDENT:State of Uttar Pradesh DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/11/2003 BENCH:Doraiswamy Raju & Arijit Pasayat.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T D. RAJU, J.The above appeals, arising out of a common judgment dated ...

Judges: P Venkatarama Reddi, Dr Ar Lakshmanan

28 November, 2003·JUDGMENT The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Dr. AR. LAKSHMANAN, J. : The present appeal was filed against the judgment dated 19.05.1995 pronounced by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad by which the writ petition of the appellant bearing No. 1607 of 1988 was dismi...

Judges: Brijesh Kumar, Arun Kumar

28 November, 2003·JUDGMENT WITH CIVIL APPEAL N0. 753/2001 The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by Appellant Collector, Hyderabad Dist.,Andhra Pradesh Versus Mohammed Mohiuddin & Ors. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1107-1111/2001 Union of India Appellant Versus Mohammed Mohiuddin & Ors. Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL ...

Judges: Brijesh Kumar, Arun Kumar

28 November, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 6877-6881 of 2000 PETITIONER:Secunderabad Cantonment Board,Andhra Circle,Secunderabad rep.by Execu.Officer RESPONDENT:Mohammed Mohiuddin and Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/11/2003 BENCH:Brijesh Kumar & Arun Kumar.JUDGMENT:JUDGMENT WITH CIVIL APPEAL N0. 753/2001 The State of Andhra...

Judges: S B Sinha

28 November, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (civil) 6301 of 2001 PETITIONER:Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti Pilibhit & Ors.RESPONDENT:Pilibhit Pantnagar Beej Ltd. & Anr. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/11/2003 BENCH:S.B. Sinha JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T S.B. Sinha, J.The core question involved in this appeal is as to whether ‘seed’ would come ...

Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat

28 November, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 20 of 2003 PETITIONER:Surendra Paswan RESPONDENT:State of Jharkhand DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/11/2003 BENCH:DORAISWAMY RAJU & ARIJIT PASAYAT.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T ARIJIT PASAYAT,J One Barhan Das (hereinafter referred to as the deceased) paid price for changing his loyalty from o...

Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat J U D G M E N T Arijit Pasayat J The Appellant No 1 Ram Dular Rai Faced Trial For The Commission Of Offences Punishable Under Sections 302 And 307 Of The Indian Penal Code 1860 For Short The Ipc The Other Appellants Were Tried For Offences Relatable To Section 302 Read With Section 149 Ipc And Section 307 Read With Section 149 Ipc Each Of The Appellants Was Also Tried For Commission Of Offence Punishable Under Section 148 Ipc And Section 27 Of The Arms Act 1959 In Short The Arms Act They Were Found Guilty And Sentenced To Undergo Imprisonment For Life For The Offence Relatable To Section 302 Or Section 302 Read With Section 149 Ipc As The Case May Be Appellant No 1 Was Further Sentenced To Undergo Imprisonment For 10 Years For The Offence Relatable To Section 307 Ipc And Other Three Appellants Were Sentenced To Five Years Imprisonment For The Offence Relatable To Section 307 Read With Section 149 Ipc Each Of Them Were Sentenced To Undergo Imprisonment For Three Years For The Offence Relatable To Section 148 Ipc And Section 27 Of The Arms Act In Appeal By The Impugned Judgment Appeal Of The Appellant Ram Dular Rai Was Dismissed In Respect Of Other Appellants Conviction For Offences Relatable To Section 307 Read With Section 149 Ipc Was Set Aside The Background Facts Leading To The Trial Is As Follows The Informant Baleshwar Nath Singh Pw 6 In His Fardbayan Recorded On 17 3 1988 At About 1 05 A M Stated That He Was Sleeping In The Night On The Dalan Of The House Where A Lantern And A Dhibri Were Burning Giving Sufficient Light In The Dalan He Was Sleeping At The Eastern Extreme On A Cot And Near Him His Son Kamla Singh Daughter Of Kamla Singh Renu Devi Pw 2 Were Also Sleeping Other Members Of The Family Were Sleeping Inside The Rooms At About 12 30 A M The Accused Appellants

27 November, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 371-372 of 2003 PETITIONER:Ram Dular Rai & Ors.RESPONDENT:State of Bihar DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/11/2003 DORAISWAMY RAJU & ARIJIT PASAYAT.J U D G M E N T ARIJIT PASAYAT,J The appellant No.1 (Ram Dular Rai) faced trial for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 302 a...

Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, Arijit Pasayat

27 November, 2003·CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 506 of 1997 PETITIONER:State of Karnataka RESPONDENT:Puttaraja DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/11/2003 BENCH:DORAISWAMY RAJU & ARIJIT PASAYAT.JUDGMENT:J U D G M E N T ARIJIT PASAYAT,J A rapist not only causes physical injuries but more indelibly leaves a scar on the most cherished posses...