Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

M/S Super Bhootpurv Sainik Suraksha Samiti vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 July, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20589 of 2018 Petitioner :- M/S Super Bhootpurv Sainik Suraksha Samiti Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mritunjay Mohan Sahai
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
On account of delay in making payment of the work done, the petitioner is claiming damages. He wants to pursue his representation filed before respondent No.3.
Sri S.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent No.3 has no objection if direction is issued for the decision of the aforesaid representation.
In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent No.3 to consider the representation of the petitioner, if any, with regard to payment of damages and interest in accordance with law most expeditiously.
Order Date :- 30.7.2018 piyush
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M/S Super Bhootpurv Sainik Suraksha Samiti vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 July, 2018
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
Advocates
  • Anand Kumar Srivastava