Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Suny Kumar Yadav vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14713 of 2019 Applicant :- Suny Kumar Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Shashi Dhar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
List has been revised. Learned counsel for the complainant Sri Pankaj Kumar Sukla is not present.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant in connection with Case Crime No. 34 of 2019 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B I.P.C. and Sections 6/9 of U.P.
Public Examination Act, 1988, P.S. Vidhnu, District Kanpur Nagar.
The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the accused is quite innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. He further submitted that as per the F.I.R., the applicant was giving examination in place of other person. All offences are triable by the Court of Magistrate and below seven years of punishment.
He has placed reliance in the case of Data Ram Vs. State of
U.P. and others, 2018(3) SCC 22. The accused is languishing in jail since 28.01.2019 and in case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail plea.
Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.
Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed.
Let the applicant Suny Kumar Yadav be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
i) The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
ii) The applicant will not tamper with the witnesses.
iii) The applicant will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 25.7.2019 Shanu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Suny Kumar Yadav vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 July, 2019
Judges
  • Ajit Singh
Advocates
  • Shashi Dhar Pandey