Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Sunil Shastri vs The Development Commissioner

Madras High Court|23 November, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
23.11.2017 Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No cse To
1.The Development Commissioner MEPZ Special Economic zone National Highway  45 Tambaram, Chennai.
2. The Commissioner of Central Excise Chennai IV Commissionerate, MHU Complex, Nandanam, Chennai.
3. The Director Foreign Investment Promotion Board Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion Ministry of Finance, Government of India New Delhi.
T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.
cse W.P.No.14764 of 2010 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2010 23.11.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sunil Shastri vs The Development Commissioner

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
23 November, 2017