Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mr Sunil Kumar Thakur vs The Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|23 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF JANUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. T. NARENDRA PRASAD W.P.No.29653 OF 2014(GM-TEN) AND W.P.Nos.31548-31551 OF 2014 BETWEEN:
Mr.Sunil Kumar Thakur, S/o.C.S.Thakur, Aged about 34 years, Residing at D.No.50/2, 8th Cross, Shivanandanagar, Moodalapalya, Bangalore North, Nagarabhavi, Bangalore – 560 040. … Petitioner (By Sri S.Vishwajith Shetty, Advocate) AND:
1. The Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike, N.R.Squares, Bangalore, Represented by its Commissioner – 560 002.
2. The Executive Engineer, Gandhinagar Division, Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike, Bangalore – 560 002.
3. The Executive Engineer, Mahalakshmipuram Division, Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike, M.G.Road, Bangalore – 560 002.
4. The Executive Engineer, Malleshwaram Division, Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike, Bangalore – 560 003.
5. The Executive Engineer, Chamarajapet Division, Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike, Bangalore – 560 018.
6. The Executive Engineer Rajajinagar Division, Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike, M.G.Road, Bangalore – 560 001.
7. State of Karnataka, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Municipal Administration, Vidhana Soudha, Bangalore – 560 001. ... Respondents (By Sri K.N.Puttegowda, Advocate for R1 to R6: Smt.Niloufer Akbar, AGA for R7) These writ petitions are filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the entire tender proceedings pursuant to the Tender Notification issued by R2 to R6 as per Annexure-A dated 04.02.2013, Annexure-B dated 5.2.2013, Annexure-C dated 24.01.2013, Annexure-D dated 17.1.2013 and Annexure-E dated 31.1.2013 respectively and etc.
These writ petitions, coming on for preliminary hearing ‘B’ Group, this day, the Court, made the following:
ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the prayer sought for in the petitions does not survive for consideration and hence seeks for dismissal of the petitions as not pressed.
The memo is placed on record.
These writ petitions are dismissed as not pressed.
Cm/-
Sd/- JUDGE
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mr Sunil Kumar Thakur vs The Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
23 January, 2019
Judges
  • H T Narendra Prasad