Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9467 of 2019 Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Srivastava And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary corrections in the writ petition.
Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
During course of arguments learned counsel for the petitioner confined with prayer no. 2 only by which a prayer was made to issue a mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the representation dated 21.5.2019 submitted by them.
The facts, in brief as narrated in the writ petition is that initially the petitioners were engaged as Data Entry Operator on contractual basis for computarisation of revenue record at Tehsil level. It is further contended that after a period of one year came to an end petitioners were again directed to work upto 31st May, 2012. It is contented that since thereafter petitioners were not permitted to work they approached this Court by filing Writ A No. 29451 of 2014 (Sunil Kumar Srivastava and 4 others Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) in which an order was passed on 3rd August, 2017. A copy of which is appended as Annexure-3 to the writ petition. It is contended that after the aforesaid order was passed the petitioners were again permitted to work in the year 2017 but since 20th May, 2019 petitioners were not permitted to work. In this regard learned counsel for the petitioners also relied upon the order dated 1.5.2019 by which period of certain other similarly situated Date Entry Operators were permitted to work. It is further contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that in this regards the petitioners have also submitted representation but till date no decision has been taken by the District Magistrate/respondent no. 2.
With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties this writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage itself.
In the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice the petitioners are directed to submit fresh representation ventilating all their grievances, along with a certified copy of this order before the respondent no. 2-District Magistrate Jaunpur within a period of two week from today. In the event such a representation is made, the respondent no. 2 is directed to pass a reasoned speaking order on the said representation within a period of four weeks thereafter.
With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition stands disposed of.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the authority concern shall pass order independently, in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 3.6.2019 M.A.Ansari