Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Suneeta vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41941 of 2021 Applicant :- Suneeta Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Tirpathi,Nimesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
Heard over bail application moved by the applicant, Suneeta, in Case Crime No. 235 of 2021, under Sections- 498-A, 304-B, I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station-Buxa, District- Jaunpur.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA representing the State. Perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is innocent; she has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number and is languishing in jail since 13.07.2021; she is of no criminal antecedent; no accusation of demand of dowry or cruelty with regard to it is there in the First Information Report or in the statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. of the informant; applicant is of separate living having no concern with the affairs of the deceased or her husband; it was a suicide by the deceased by ante mortem hanging; there is no ante mortem injury except mark of ligature of ante mortem hanging; husband her bed room companion is languishing in jail; he is expected to explain circumstances under Section 106 of the Evidence Act; applicant being lady is entitled for bail; there is no likelihood of applicant's fleeing from course of justice or tempering with evidence in case of release on bail; hence bail has been prayed for.
Learned AGA has vehemently opposed bail, but could not oppose this fact that the applicant is of no criminal antecedent.
Having heard learned counsel for both the parties, gone through the material placed on record and considering the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction but without commenting on the merits of the case, a case for bail is made out, accordingly allowed.
Let the applicant, Suneeta, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.
2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.
3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial.
4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court unless her personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned.
In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail.
Order Date :- 22.12.2021 Deepak/
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Suneeta vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 December, 2021
Judges
  • Ram Krishna Gautam
Advocates
  • Vinod Kumar Tirpathi Nimesh Kumar Shukla