Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sundar vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|25 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7023 of 2019 Applicant :- Sundar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Pradhumn Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
Certified copy of the statement recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. filed by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This bail application has been filed by the applicant Sundar seeking bail in Case Crime No. 0819 of 2018, under Sections 363 IPC, P.S. Transport Nagar, District Meerut.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is wholly innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Learned counsel for the applicant has next drawn the attention of the Court towards the statement of the victim recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C.. in which she has stated that she is about 17 years of age and had gone with the applicant on her own free will and volition and wants to stay with the applicant and has solemnised marriage with the applicant on 3.12.2018 and she does not want to go to her home and wants to live with the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant has next submitted that from perusal of the said statement, it is evident that the victim had gone with the applicant on her own free will and volition and the applicant has not enticed her away or forcibly taken her away.
It is lastly submitted that the applicant has no other criminal history to his credit and the applicant is in jail since 12.12.2018 and in case the applicant is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial..
Learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.
Let the applicant Sundar be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity.
(ii) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iv) The applicant shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, it will be open to the opposite parties to approach the Court for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 25.2.2019 R
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sundar vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
25 February, 2019
Judges
  • Rajiv Gupta
Advocates
  • Pradhumn Kumar Pandey