Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Sunita Sahni vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|12 August, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
1. Heard.
2. Notice on behalf of opposite parties no.1 and 2 has been accepted by the office of the learned Chief Standing Counsel.
3. For the order proposed to be passed, we do not find it necessary to issue notice to opposite party no.3, as such, notice to opposite party no.3 is dispensed with.
4. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:-
"(I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 27.11.2019, contained in Annexure no.1, passed by committee presided by the District Magistrate, by which he rejected the claim of the petitioner.
(II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the opposite parties to release the payment to the petitioner under the Mukhyamantri Kisan Evam Sarvhit Bima Yojna.
3. Issue any other order or direction .... circumstances of the case.
4. Cost of the writ petition may also be awarded to the petitioner."
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim of the petitioner for the benefit of Mukyamantri Kisan Evam Sarvhit Bima Yojna has been denied. A perusal of the impugned order would indicate that the Examination Committee (District Level Committee) has rejected the claim of the petitioner having found to be time barred.
6. It is submitted that this Court vide judgment and order dated 11.11.2020 passed in Writ C No. 15983 of 2020, Gautam Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) reported in (2021) 1 ALJ 351; has directed that all the claims filed within a period of three years from the death of farmer or within a period of three years from the date of rejection of their claim, either partly or wholly by the Insurance Company should be treated to be filed within limitation period and should be processed on their merits.
The relevant paragraphs are reproduced below:-
"As innumerable cases are filed seeking compensation under the schemes across the State, we direct that all the claims filed within a period of three years from the date of death or within a period of three years from the date of rejection of claim, either partly or wholly by the Insurance Company, should be treated to be filed within limitation and should be processed on merits.
As we have held that the limitation provided under the said Scheme is unreasonable and arbitrary and have substituted the said period by a period of three years, as recorded above, we direct the Registrar General of this Court to transmit a copy of this order to The Chief Secretary State of Uttar Pradesh and Director Institutional Finance, State of Uttar Pradesh, for its communication to all the District Magistrates in the State and the District Magistrates in turn are directed to entertain and process the claims filed under the Scheme within limitation as prescribed above by this Court treating them to be within limitation and the same should be processed on their merits.
We have directed and provided for the limitation of three years, till the time the State Government takes an appropriate decision and amends limitation clauses of the Scheme to make them more reasonable taking into account the socio economic condition of the society as well the laws of India.
The writ petition is allowed in terms of the said order.
The District Magistrate, Jaunpur shall now process the claim of the petitioner in accordance with law on its merit treating the same to be within limitation and the same shall be processed expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of filing of the copy of this order."
7. In view of above, the writ petition is allowed in terms of the judgment and order dated 11.11.2020 passed in the case of Gautam Yadav (supra) and quash the impugned order dated 27.11.2019 with respect to the petitioner and, direct the concerning competent authority to process the claim of the petitioner in accordance with law on its merit, treating the same to be within limitation and the same shall be processed expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of filing of a certified copy of this order.
.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) (Ritu Raj Awasthi, J.) Order Date :- 12.8.2021 Lokesh Kumar
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sunita Sahni vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
12 August, 2021
Judges
  • Ritu Raj Awasthi
  • Dinesh Kumar Singh