Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Sunita Devi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|12 April, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State through video conferencing.
The petitioner seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the first information report dated 23.03.2021 registered as F.I.R. No. 0048 of 2021, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 272 I.P.C. and Section 60A of U.P. Excise Act, Police Station Behtamujawar, District Unnao.
From a plain reading of the F.I.R., it appears that a cognizable offence, prima facie, is made out against the petitioner. It is well settled that once the F.I.R. discloses commission of cognizable offence, interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is impermissible in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of State of Harayana and others versus Bhajan Lal and other, AIR 1992 SC 604; State of Bihar and another versus Md. Khalique and another, 2002(1) SCC 652 and Girish Kumar Suneja versus Central Bureau of Investigation(2017) 14 SCC 809.
The writ petition is dismissed without prejudice to the remedy of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.p.c. available to the petitioner.
Order Date :- 12.4.2021 VKS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sunita Devi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
12 April, 2021
Judges
  • Attau Rahman Masoodi
  • Rajeev Singh