Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Sumithramma And Others vs Sri S Venkatamuni And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|29 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.M.SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 363 OF 2017 (PAR) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. SUMITHRAMMA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS WIFE OF LATE SRI. C.V. VENKATESHAPPA.
2. SMT. LEELAVATHI AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS DAUGHTER OF LATE SRI. C.V. VENKATESHAPPA.
3. SMT. NAVALEELA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS DAUGHTER OF LATE SRI C.V. VENKATESHAPPA.
4. SRI AVESH AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS SON OF LATE SRI C.V. VENKATESHAPPA.
5. SRI. LEYSHODANA AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS SON OF LATE SRI. C.V. VENKATESHAPPA.
1 TO 5 ARE RESIDENTS OF CHELAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, BANGARAPET TALUK.
... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. PATTABI RAMAN. C., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1. SRI. S. VENKATAMUNI AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS SON OF LATE SRI SUBBAIAH RESIDING AT S. VENKATARAMAIAH COMPOUND, 5TH CROSS, ROBERTSONPET, KOLAR GOLD FIELDS – 563 122.
2. SRI. RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS SON OF LATE SRI. SUBBAIAH.
3. SRI VENATARAMA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS SON OF LATE SRI SUBBAIAH.
4. SRI MUNISWAMY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS SON OF LATE SRI SUBBAIAH.
RESPOMDEMTS 1 TO 4 ABOVE RESIDING AT CHALEGANAHALLI, BANGARAPET TALUK.
... RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.07.2016 PASSED IN RA NO.243 OF 13 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE, KOLAR (SITTING AT KGF), PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.02.2013 PASSED IN OS NO.395/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.), BANGARPET.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGEMENT None appears for the appellants.
2. This Court on 1.2.2019 granted two weeks’ time to comply with the office objections, subject to the condition that the appeal would stand dismissed if the office objections are not complied with. The office objections have not been complied with despite this order.
3. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
SD/- JUDGE nv Ct:sr
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Sumithramma And Others vs Sri S Venkatamuni And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
29 August, 2019
Judges
  • B M Shyam Prasad