Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Sumit Yadav @ Dimpal Yadav vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|08 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15127 of 2021 Applicant :- Sumit Yadav @ Dimpal Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Badan Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Chand,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record of the present bail application.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant Sumit Yadav @ Dimpal Yadav with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 13 of 2021, under Sections 420, 467, 471, 120-B I.P.C. and 66D, 72 I.T Act and 4/10 U.P. Public Examination Act 1998, Police Station Lohamandi, District Agra.
Learned counsel for the applicant in support of his prayer for bail submits that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that co-accused Rajveer having similar role to that of applicant has already granted bail by this Court vide order dated 5.4.2021 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 13791 of 2021, therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. The applicant has not previous criminal history, he is not likely to abscond.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant but conceded on point of parity.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, let the applicant Sumit Yadav @ Dimpal Yadav involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity.
(ii) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iv) The applicant shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, liberty may be given to the trial court to cancel the bail without any reference to this Court.
Order Date :- 8.4.2021 PS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sumit Yadav @ Dimpal Yadav vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
08 April, 2021
Judges
  • Subhash Chand
Advocates
  • Ram Badan Maurya