Court No. - 60
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15714 of 2018 Applicant :- Sumit Rai Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Chaddha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ravindra Nath Kakkar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The present bail application has been filed for enlarging the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.0107 of 2018, under Sections 386, 507 I.P.C., Police Station Rajghat, District Gokharpur.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the applicant is not named in the FIR. It is next submitted that applicant has no other criminal history to his credit and is languishing in jail since 27.03.2018.
Learned A.G.A. has, however, opposed the prayer for bail to the applicant but could not dispute the facts as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.
Let applicant Sumit Rai be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions :-
(i) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity.
(ii) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iv) The applicant shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, it will be open to the opposite parties to approach the Court for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 27.4.2018 Anand Sri./-