Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sumit Kumar vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 51867 of 2019 Applicant :- Sumit Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Tiwari,Debee Shanker Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The submission is that the age of the victim as per medical report is 17 years. Given margin of two years on the higher side she can be considered to be major. From her statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. it appears that she left her house on account of scolding by her mother. When she came to know that her father has lodged the F.I.R. she came back to her house. However in her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C. she has made allegation of rape against the applicant and co-accused, Avnish. It has been submitted that the medical report does not supports the allegation made in the F.I.R. Doctor has not found any injury on the body of the victim including her private parts. The applicant is in jail since 14.06.2019 and has no criminal history to his credit.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by learned counsel for the applicant.
After considering the rival submissions noted hereinabove, larger mandate of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the material brought on record and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
Let the applicant- Sumit Kumar, be released on bail in Case Crime No. 125 of 2019, under Sections- 363, 366, 376D I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station- Matsaina, District- Firozabad, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice :-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 26.11.2019 Rohit
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sumit Kumar vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 November, 2019
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Santosh Kumar Tiwari Debee Shanker Pandey