Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Suman vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|06 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 52
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6076 of 2021 Applicant :- Smt. Suman Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Yogesh Kumar Mishra,Alok Kumar Mishra,Ganesh Mani,Shyam Singh Somvanshi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajnish Dubey
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
List revised. None present for the informant.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. She has not committed the present offence. Offence under Section 306 IPC is not attracted in the present matter. Although substance of the video said to have been prepared by the deceased have been reduced in writing in the case diary but same is not sufficient to attract the offence under Section 306 IPC. Deceased committed suicide herself. Applicant never caused cruelty or harassment to the deceased nor demanded any amount as disclosed in the F.I.R. for divorce. No prima facie case is made out against the applicant. The applicant has no criminal history. She is languishing in jail since 14.12.2020 and in case she is released on bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Smt. Suman involved in Case Crime No. 820 of 2020, under Sections 306 IPC, P.S. Surajpur, District - Gautam Budh Nagar be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which she is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which she is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.
The party shall file computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad. The concerned Court / Authority / Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 6.4.2021 Sanjeet Digitally signed by Justice Om Prakash Date: 2021.04.06 14:28:52 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Suman vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
06 April, 2021
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii
Advocates
  • Yogesh Kumar Mishra Alok Kumar Mishra Ganesh Mani Shyam Singh Somvanshi