Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Sulaiman @ Lalkhan Jawathkhan vs Govindan And Others

Madras High Court|15 March, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15.03.2017 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ C.M.A.No.931 of 2017 Sulaiman @ Lalkhan Jawathkhan ... Appellant vs.
1. Govindan
2. Future General India Insurance Co., Trichy-1.
3. Avuranjam ... Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Order and Decreetal Order in MCOP No.343 of 2011 dated 30.10.2015 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Principal Sub Court), Vridhachalam.
For Appellant : Mr.S.Udayakumar For Respondents : Mr.N.Vijayaraghavan (for R2) J U D G M E N T
[Order of the Court was made by S.MANIKUMAR, J.]
Not satisfied with the quantum of compensation of Rs.33,03,453/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum, from the date claim till deposit and costs, to the injured, aged about 38 years, an Irrigation and Plumbing Supervisor, who suffered 70% disablement, due to the crush injury, resulting in amputation of left leg, has filed the instant appeal for enhancement of compensation, and restricted to Rs.20,00,000/-.
2. Going through the award and material on record, we could deduce that appellant/injured was hospitalised between 21.09.2011 and 11.10.2011 in Pondicherry-PIMS Hospital. Income claimed was 350 Kuwait Dinars. Supporting avocation and salary, the appellant/injured has marked Ex.P.17, copy of the Passport, Ex.P18, Return Air Ticket to Kuwait, Ex.P19, Salary certificate for 320 Kuwait Dinar, Ex.P20, copy of Employment ID Card, Ex.P22, letter of the employer removing from service and Ex.P23, Order sanctioning, terminal benefits to the appellant/injured.
3. On the basis of oral and documentary evidence, the tribunal fixed the monthly income as Rs.20,000/-. Finding that there is a permanent disablement, due to amputation of left leg, and correlating the same, with employment, the tribunal has awarded compensation of Rs.33,03,453/-, with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum, from the date of claim till deposit.
4. On the appeal filed for enhancement of compensation, we have requested the learned counsel for both parties to consider the various heads under which compensation could be enhanced, on the principle of just compensation.
5. Going through the same, learned counsel for the parties on consensus agreed that compensation awarded by tribunal should be enhanced to Rs.51,90,453/-, as hereunder:
Monthly Income is fixed at : Rs.25,000/-
Future prospects 50% : Rs.12,500/- Total income : Rs.37,500/-
Loss of Income [Rs.37,500/- x 12 x 15 x 70%] : Rs.47,25,000/-
Pain and suffering : Rs. 1,50,000/-
Attender charges : Rs. 30,000/-
Extra Nourishment : Rs. 30,000/-
Medical Bills : Rs. 2,05,453/- Transport based on Exs.P16 & P27 : Rs. 50,000/-
Total : Rs.51,90,453/- Compensation awarded by the Tribunal : Rs.33,03,453/-
In the light of consensus, amount is enhanced by : Rs.18,87,000/-
6. In the light of consensus arrived, appellant/injured is entitled to an enhanced compensation of Rs.51,90,453/- as against Rs.33,03,453/-, awarded by the tribunal, with interest, at the rate of 7.5% per annum, from the date claim till deposit.
7. In view of the above, we direct Future General India Insurance Company, Trichy, the 2nd respondent herein, to deposit the enhanced amount of Rs.51,90,453/-, with interest, at the rate of 7.5% per annum, from the date of claim till deposit and costs, less the statutory deposit, to the credit of MCOP No.343 of 2011 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Principal Sub Court), Vridhachalam, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such deposit, the appellant/claimant is permitted to withdraw the same, by making necessary applications before the tribunal.
8. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed as indicated above. No costs.
Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ars To The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (Principal Sub Court), Vridhachalam.
[S.M.K., J.] [M.G.R.,J.] 15.03.2017 S.MANIKUMAR, J.
AND M.GOVINDARAJ, J.
ars C.M.A.No.931 of 2017
15.03.2017
http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sulaiman @ Lalkhan Jawathkhan vs Govindan And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
15 March, 2017
Judges
  • S Manikumar
  • M Govindaraj