Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Suguna Ramaiah vs State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|08 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.4537/2019(KLR-RES) BETWEEN SMT SUGUNA RAMAIAH S/O LATE M RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT HOUSE No.652, 2ND PHASE, RAJAJINAGARA BANGALORE 560 010 REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER SRI RAGHAVENDRA R S/O LATE M RAMAIAH AGED 59 YEARS, R/AT NO.18, DORTHSWORTH ENCLAVE WHITEFIELD BANGALORE-560066 ... PETITIONER (BY SRI MITHUN G A, ADVOCATE) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING Dr. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560001 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA-561 203 3. THE TAHSILDAR HOSAKOTE TALUK HOSAKOTE-560 067 4. MUNIRATHNAMMA @ RATHNAMMA D/O MUNISHAMAPPA @ MUNISHAMI AGED ABOUT YEARS KARIBEERANAHALLI VILLAGE JADIGENAHALLI HOBLI HOSAKOTE TALUK-560 067 .
...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VENKATESH DODDERI, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOs.1 TO 3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD:11.06.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-A ON THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT UNDER SEC.136[2] OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND CONSEQUENTLY TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.11.2018 PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT HEREIN VIDE ANNEXURE-B DATED 20.11.2018 BY MUTATING THE NAME OF 4TH RESPONDENT IN THE REVENUE RECORDS IN RESPECT OF SY NO.65/26, NEW SY NO.80 MEASURING 3 ACRES 20 GUNTAS OF LAND SITUATED AT KARIBEERANAHOSAHALLI VILLAGE, JADIGENAHALLI HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK BY ALLOWING THIS W.P. AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO RESTORE THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER VIDE MR No.12/2006-07 AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition.
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE sma
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Suguna Ramaiah vs State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
08 April, 2019
Judges
  • S N Satyanarayana