Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sugreev vs State Of U P Thru Secy And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 61057 of 2012 Petitioner :- Sugreev Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Paritosh Kumar Malviya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohammad Mustafa Khan,R.P. Srivastava Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
Sri Paritosh Kumar Malviya, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the matter has become infructuous, which may be dismissed as not pressed.
The matter is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Order Date :- 24.4.2018 Ishan
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sugreev vs State Of U P Thru Secy And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 April, 2018
Judges
  • Bharati Sapru
Advocates
  • Paritosh Kumar Malviya

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.