Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27054 of 2021 Petitioner :- Sugna Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through District Magistrate And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Patel Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 3 to decide mutation application of the petitioner bearing computerise case no. T20 21217500888004985 (Sugna Devi Vs. Late Shitala Prasad), U/s 33(1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 3-Tehsildar, Tehsil Soraon, District - Prayagraj considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 3-Tehsildar, Tehsil Soraon, District - Prayagraj is directed to decide mutation application of the petitioner bearing computerise case no. T20 21217500888004985 (Sugna Devi Vs. Late Shitala Prasad), U/s 33(1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
5. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
6. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 28.10.2021 Ravi/-