Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sudhir Kumar vs R N Vishkarma

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 59
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1628 of 2018 Applicant :- Sudhir Kumar Opposite Party :- R.N. Vishkarma, District Inspector Of School Counsel for Applicant :- Nitin Sharma
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
Admittedly, the claim laid before the concerned D.I.O.S. is for filling a Class-IV post. This prayer cannot possibly be considered by the D.I.O.S. in light of the amendment to the Regulation 101 as contained in the regulations framed under the provisions of the 1921 Act. It is also not disputed that the validity of Regulation 101 is pending consideration before this Court in a batch of writ petitions.
Consequently, this Court, in the absence of any challenge laid to the said provision or a declaration rendered by the Court that the same is invalid, finds no ground to initiate proceedings in contempt.
The contempt petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 26.4.2018 Arun K. Singh
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sudhir Kumar vs R N Vishkarma

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 April, 2018
Judges
  • Yashwant Varma
Advocates
  • Nitin Sharma