Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sudhanshu Sharma vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 May, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 44
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18708 of 2018 Applicant :- Sudhanshu Sharma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. for the State.
This application under Section 482 Cr.P.c. has been filed for a direction upon the court below to decide the S.T. No. 671 of 2016 (State Vs. Sudhanshu Sharma) under Sections 354-A, 506 IPC and 3(1)(10) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Katghar, District Moradabad.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that the Court below shall proceed to decide the above mentioned complaint case with all expedition, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties and by fixing short dates.
With the aforesaid directions, the application is finally disposed of.
Order Date :- 28.5.2018 S. Thakur
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sudhanshu Sharma vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 May, 2018
Judges
  • Rajeev Misra
Advocates
  • Anil Kumar Tiwari