Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sudhanshu Rai @ Aditya Rai vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 48
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45376 of 2019 Applicant :- Sudhanshu Rai @ Aditya Rai Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Tewari,Jai Prakash Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,J.
Learned counsel for the State submits that subsequent to registration of FIR, present case has been transferred to Police Station- City, District Buxur (Bihar) and there, a separate crime number, being Crime No.506 of 2019, has been registered against the applicant under Sections 379 and 411 of IPC. He further submits that now the remedy for the applicant lies at Buxur (Bihar) and not in this Court.
In view of this statement made by counsel for the State, learned counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this application with liberty to avail the remedy available to him in accordance with law. Order accordingly.
Order Date :- 29.11.2019 RKK/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sudhanshu Rai @ Aditya Rai vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 November, 2019
Judges
  • Pritinker Diwaker
Advocates
  • Rajesh Tewari Jai Prakash Rai