Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sudama And Another vs Consolidation Officer And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|17 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 49
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 3074 of 2019 Petitioner :- Sudama And Another Respondent :- Consolidation Officer And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Jitendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.1.
In view of the order proposed to be passed, notices need not to be issued to the private respondents.
The petitioners have before this Court for a direction to respondent no.1/Consolidation Officer, Tehsil-Padarauna, District Kushi Nagar to decide restoration application in case no.1108 of 1995 (Laxman Vs. Sudama) expeditiously within a stipulated period.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the respondent no.1/Consolidation Officer, Tehsil- Padarauna, District Kushi Nagar to consider and decide the aforesaid restoration application in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order but certainly after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, except upon payment of cost.
Order Date :- 17.12.2019 Pramod Tripathi
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sudama And Another vs Consolidation Officer And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
17 December, 2019
Judges
  • Prakash Padia
Advocates
  • Jitendra Pratap Singh