Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sudama Devi vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|19 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42475 of 2018 Petitioner :- Sudama Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Asthana Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for State - respondents.
By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2, the Commissioner, Azamgarh Division, Azamgarh to decide the Revision No. 49- B/C20171500317 of 2016 (Parvati vs. Sudama Devi and another), expeditiously.
No useful purpose will be served in keeping the writ petition pending. This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2, the Commissioner, Azamgarh Division, Azamgarh, to decide Revision No. 49- B/C20171500317 of 2016 (Parvati vs. Sudama Devi and another), in accordance with law, within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
It is made clear that the Court has not adjudicated the claim of the petitioner on merits.
Order Date :- 19.12.2018 samz
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sudama Devi vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
19 December, 2018
Judges
  • Piyush Agrawal
Advocates
  • Amit Kumar Asthana