Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Subramaniam And Others vs The State By The Inspector Of Police And Others

Madras High Court|20 June, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When this Criminal Original Petition was taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the second respondent, have filed a Memorandum of Understanding dated 21.08.2015, duly signed by the petitioner, R.MAHADEVAN, J.
sr second respondent and the counsel for the petitioner, in which it is stated that the petitioner and the second respondent have now arrived at a compromise and both of them have decided to settle all their issues among themselves. It is also stated in the Memorandum of Understanding that the second respondent is not willing to pursue the complaint any further.
2. Both the parties are present. Their identities have been verified and they accepted the contents in the Memorandum of Understanding as true and genuine.
3. The Memorandum of Understanding is recorded and the same shall form part of this order. In view of the joint compromise memo, the proceedings in C.C.No.6 of 2016 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Coimbatore against the petitioners, is quashed, and the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of in terms of the Memorandum of Understanding. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Index : Yes/No 20.06.2017 Internet : Yes/No sr To
1. The Inspector of Police, B3, Law and Order, Kattor Police Station, Coimbatore
2. The Public Prosecutor,High Court, Chennai-600 104. http://www.judis.nic.in Crl.O.P.No.26896/2016
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Subramaniam And Others vs The State By The Inspector Of Police And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
20 June, 2017
Judges
  • R Mahadevan