HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.10681 OF 2014 Date:15.04.2014 Between:
M/s. Subodhaya Welfare Society and others .. Petitioners And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.10681 OF 2014 ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Revenue.
The relief sought for in the writ petition is too vague. Apart from that, the petitioner is also questioning letter in Lr.No.C1/927/2014, dated 20.02.2014, of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Sangareddy Division – the 3rd respondent. A reading of the said letter shows that the petitioner Society filed application, dated 11.01.2012, before the District Collector, Medak District – the 2nd respondent, requesting for regularisation with respect to Acs.15.23 guntas in Survey No.196 of Ameenpur Village, Patancheru Mandal, Medak District. On the said request, it appears that the 2nd respondent called for a report from the 3rd respondent and the 3rd respondent sent a report, dated 20.02.2014 to the 2nd respondent. The said report is, therefore, only a communication between the 3rd respondent and the 2nd respondent and is only in the nature of internal correspondence. Hence, the petitioners cannot challenge the same in the present writ petition, as the rights of the parties are not decided by the said report and it is ultimately for the 2nd respondent to take appropriate decision in the matter in the light of all attendant circumstances, including the aforesaid report of the 3rd respondent.
In my view, the writ petition is clearly premature, as the report sent by the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent in response to his requisition cannot form the basis of the present writ petition. With respect to the rest of the relief sought for against the private parties are concerned, alleging interference by them, the petitioners can as well approach the competent civil Court and seek appropriate relief therefor, if the law permits.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of directing the District Collector – the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders on the application of the petitioner society for regularisation, expeditiously. There shall be no order as to costs.
The miscellaneous petitions, if any, filed in this writ petition shall stand closed.
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J
15.04.2014 KH