Court No. - 12
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18904 of 2018 Applicant :- Subhas And 2 Ors Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A for the State and Sri Pawan Kumar, Advocate, who has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2.
I do not find any merit in this application warranting interference in inherent jurisdiction.
At this stage the learned counsel for the applicants made a prayer that the bail application of the applicants in Case No.3989 of 2013, under Sections 376-D IPC and 3(2) 5 SC/ST Act, Police Station Kotwali, District Maharajganj be ordered to be considered expeditiously, if possible on the same day by the Court below.
After hearing learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. this application is finally disposed of with a direction that if the applicants appear and surrender before the Courts below within two weeks from today and apply for bail, then their bail application shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid down by the Seven Judges' decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P., reported in 2004 (57) ALR-290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) after hearing the Public Prosecutor in the aforesaid crime number for the aforesaid offences.
Order Date :- 28.5.2018 SS