Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

Stm. Nageena Devi vs State Of U.P. And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 January, 2010

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned AGA and perused the record.
The investigating officer, on completion of the investigation found sufficient materials against the petitioner and accordingly submitted the charge sheet. The learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offences. The materials collected during the investigation fully justify submission of the charge sheet by the investigating officer and taking of cognizance by the Magistrate. There does not appear to be any justification to exercise inherent power under section 482 CrPC for interference with the charge sheet. It is however, provided that the bail prayer of the applicant in case crime no. 340 of 2009, under sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 193 IPC, police station Meerganj, district Jaunpur shall be disposed of by the courts below in the light of the principles laid down in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh versus State of U.P. & others (2009) 4 SCC 437. With the aforesaid observations the petition under section 482 CrPC is disposed of finally.
Order Date :- 22.1.2010 rkb
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Stm. Nageena Devi vs State Of U.P. And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 January, 2010