Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

State vs Soukat

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 July, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 694 of 1989 Revisionist :- State Opposite Party :- Soukat Counsel for Revisionist :- A.G.A.
Counsel for Opposite Party :- R.S. Yadav
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Heard learned A.G.A. for revisionist and perused the record.
2. This criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C., has been filed aggrieved by order dated 03.02.1989 passed by Second Additional Sessions Judge, Rampur in Session Trial No.
389 of 1988, whereby it has discharged accused-respondent from the offence under Section 20 of Narcotics Act.
3. Despite repeated query, learned A.G.A. appearing for revisionist could not point out any manifest error or otherwise illegality, procedural or otherwise, so as to justify interference in criminal revision.
4. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Order Date :- 31.7.2019 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

State vs Soukat

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 July, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • A Ga