IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MAY 2014/8TH JYAISHTA, 1936 CRP.No. 367 of 2010 ----------------------------------
LAR 244/1982 of II ADDL. SUB COURT, TRIVANDRUM ..................................................
REVISION PETITIONER/JUDGMENT DEBTOR:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. LILLY K.T. RESPONDENT(S)/DECREE HOLDERS:
-------------------------------------------------------
K.S.PARIPOORNAN, AMMANCOVIL ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 001 BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH BABU THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-05-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
DCS CRP.No. 367 of 2010 APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :-
-------------------------------------------
ANNEXURE 1: EXPLANATIONS OF TAHSILDAR TO THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES :- NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE DCS C.R.P. No. 367 of 2010 -----------------------------------------
Dated this the 29th day of May, 2014
O R D E R
In view of the dismissal of C.M. Application No. 443/2010 the Civil Revision Petition is also dismissed.
V.CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS C.M. APPLN. No. 443 of 2010 in C.R.P. No. 367 of 2010 -----------------------------------------
Dated this the 29th day of May, 2014
O R D E R
No reason sufficient enough to condone the inordinate delay of 2389 days in filing the Civil Revision Petition has been made out. The correspondence between the Special Tahsildar and the District Collector and the shifting of their offices are not sound reasons to condone the delay. Moreover C.R.P. Nos. 354/2010 and 365/2010 (which are connected) have also been dismissed after refusing to condone delay. The same reason was also stated by the petitioner in those Civil Revision Petitions for condonation of delay.
The delay is not condoned and the C.M. Application is dismissed.
V.CHITAMBARESH JUDGE DCS