IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1054 OF 2016 BETWEEN:
1. CHANDRAMOHAN AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS S/O. SUBBAIAH RESIDING AT NO.69 4TH ‘A’ CROSS, 36TH MAIN DOLLAR SCHEME LAYOUT B.T.M. 1ST STAGE BENGALURU-560 068.
2. PRADEEP AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS S/O. ANAND RESIDING AT NO.50 4TH MAIN, 3RD CROSS SHANKARNAGAR MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 086.
3. BHANUPRAKASH AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS S/O. SUBBAIAH RESIDING AT NO.69 4TH ‘A’ CROSSS, 36TH MAIN DOLLAR SCHEME LAYOUT B.T.M. 1ST STAGE BENGALURU-560 068.
4. DEEPAK AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS S/O. SUBBAIAH RESIDING AT NO.69 4TH ‘A’ CROSS, 36TH MAIN DOLLAR SCHEME LAYOUT B.T.M. 1ST STAGE BENGALURU-560 068.
5. SMT. PUSHPA W/O. D. SUBBAIAH RESIDING AT NO.69 4TH ‘A’ CROSS, 36TH MAIN DOLLAR SCHEME LAYOUT B.T.M. 1ST STAGE BENGALURU-560 068.
(BY SRI: H.L. JAYARAMU, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MAHADEVAPURA POLICE STATION BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU CITY PIN – 560 001.
2. SMT. BINDUSHREE AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS W/O. CHANDRAMOHAN RESIDING AT NO.266 “ARUNODAYA”
... PETITIONERS BASAVANAGAR, HOODI BENGALURU-560 048.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI:VIJAYAKUMAR MAJAGE, ADDL. SPP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH OF FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.51900/2015 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 143, 148, 342, 392, 498(A) OF INDIAN PENAL CODE AND SECTIONS 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT AND SECTION 27 OF ARMS ACT, WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE X ADDL. CMM MAYOHALL, BENGALURU AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO ORDER FOR CALLING OF LCR AND QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED AGAINST THE PETITIONERS FOR THE REASONS STATED ABOVE.
THIS CRL.P COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R This matter is called again during post lunch session. None appears for the petitioners. Even on previous dates of hearing i.e., on 02.04.2019 and 18.01.2017, learned counsel for the petitioners remained absent, indicating that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
In view of dismissal of the main matter, I.A.No.1/16 for stay does not survive for consideration. Accordingly, it is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE *mn/-