IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G. NARENDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.7902 OF 2019 BETWEEN 1. Irfan M H S/o Hyder Vali Aged about 45 years R/at #2, Wall Street Nagavarapalya C.V.Raman Nagar Bengaluru – 560 093 2. Zeenath W/o Hyder Vali Aged about 74 years R/at #189/1, 1st Floor Narayanaswamy Layout Behind Radiant Apparels Nagavarapalya C.V.Raman Nagar Bengaluru – 560 093 3. Rihana Banu W/o Syed Rizwan Aged about 42 years R/at #13, GC Colony Tasker Town, Bengaluru-560 001 4. Syed Rizwan S/o Syed Shafiulla Aged about 48 years R/at #13, GC Colony Tasker Town, Bengaluru-560 001 5. Naseeba W/o Rizwan M H Aged about 41 years R/at #2, Wall Street Nagavarapalya C.V.Raman Nagar Bengaluru – 560 093 6. Rizwan M H S/o Hyder Vali Aged about 45 years R/at #2, Wall Street Nagavarapalya C.V.Raman Nagar Bengaluru – 560 093 (By Sri Rajashekar S, Advocate) AND 1. State of Karnataka By Pulakeshinagar Sub Division Women Police Station Represented by Special Public Prosecutor High Court of Karnataka Bengaluru – 560 001 2. Shuaiba Paikar W/o Irfan Maqdum Hyder Vali D/o Late M.M.Baig Aged about 43 years R/at #102, Eaethern Summer Apt. 10th K Cross, Opposite Charan Store Nagavarapalya C.V.Raman Nagar Bengaluru – 560 093 …Petitioners …Respondents (By Smt. B.G.Namitha Mahesh, HCGP for R1; Smt. Narthana G U, Advocate for R2) This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.4060/2019 vide document No.3, on the file of the VI ACMM at Bengaluru for the offence punishable under Section 498A, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC.
This Criminal Petition coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER The first petitioner and the second respondent/complainant are present.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that the first petitioner and the second respondent have now re-united and hence, the parties may be permitted bury their disagreements that have occurred in the past.
3. On a query, the second respondent would affirm the same. In that view of the matter, this Court is of the considered opinion that in the light of the parties having entered into an amicable settlement and having resolved their matrimonial disputes, the first petitioner and the second respondent are permitted to unite and lead a life of tranquility and peace.
4. Hence, the affidavits filed before the Court by the first petitioner and the second respondent are taken on record.
5. In the light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of GIAN SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR, the petition requires to be allowed. Consequently, proceedings in C.C.No.4060/2019 on the file of the VI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru City stands quashed.
Ordered accordingly.
Sd/- JUDGE kmv