Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S.Sushil Kumar vs The Commissioner

Madras High Court|17 November, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by both the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent that the petitioner and the 3rd respondent have entered into a joint memo of compromise, dated 17.11.2017 signed by them and their counsel and the contents of the same are extracted below: "The petitioner and 3rd respondent submits as follows:
1) The writ petitioner is seeking to quash the proceedings of the 2nd respondent bearing Notice No.ZOV.C.No/9089/2017, dated 05.07.2017. This Hon'ble Court while admitting the Writ Petition granted an order of interim stay in WMP.No.19964 of 2017 on 19.07.2017 thereby staying all further proceedings of the impugned notice of the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the writ petition.
2) In order to give a quietus to the litigation, the petitioner and 3rd respondent herein state that they have settled their disputes. In lieu of the agreed terms, the petitioner withdraws the present writ petition and undertakes not challenge the Proceedings of the 2nd respondent before any Competent Authority. The petitioner undertakes to hand over vacant possession of the subject property to the 3rd respondent within 7 days from the date of signing this Joint Memo of Compromise.
3) The 3rd respondent undertakes to withdraw RCOP No.1007 of 2017 filed for Demolition and Reconstruction pending on files of X Rent Controller, Small Causes Court, Chennai on getting back vacant possession. Similarly, the petitioner shall withdraw RCOP No.1060 of 2017 pending before the XIII Small Causes Court, Chennai without any conditions.
4) Both the parties to this document agrees that there shall not be any claim in the present or future against each other pertaining to the petition premises. The Hon'ble Court may be pleased to take on record this Joint Memo of Compromise and dispose of the Writ Petition in terms thereof and pass appropriate orders and thus render justice."
2. In view of the above Joint Memo of Compromise, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
17.11.2017 pvs To
1.The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation Rippon Buildings Park Town, Chennai 3.
2.The Regional Deputy Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation Zone V, Chennai 3.
S.VAIDYANATHAN , J., pvs W.P.No.18395 of 2017 17.11.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.Sushil Kumar vs The Commissioner

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
17 November, 2017