Ramachandra Menon,J
The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:-
a) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction compelling and commanding respondents one to four to afford adequate and effective police protection for the smooth functioning of the school and to ensure that the respondents five to seven or their men does not obstruct regular classes in the petitioner's school by preventing ingress and egress to teachers, staff, students etc who come to the school in connection with the regular school activities, and to prevent any form of political activities within the school campus by them.
b) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction compelling and commanding first respondent to consider Ext.P4 complaint in accordance with law and to take appropriate actions thereon towards redressing the grievances of the petitioner.
c) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction compelling and commanding second respondent to consider Ext.P5 complaint in accordance with law and to take appropriate actions thereon towards redressing the grievances of the petitioner.”
W.P.(C) No.27406 of 2013 2
2. When the matter came up for consideration before this Court on 7.11.2013, an interim order was granted by this Court granting police protection. Despite service of the notice, the party respondents have not chosen to appear before this Court.
3. The learned Government Pleader, appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4, submits that, the apprehension expressed from the part of the petitioner is thoroughly wrong and misconceived and there is no threat to the law and order situation. It is also stated that, there is no sustainable cause of action enabling the petitioner to approach this Court and if there occurs any threat to the law and order situation at any point of time, it is always open for the petitioner to bring to the notice of the police and the police is ready to take remedial measures.
In the light of above submission, this Court finds that, no positive direction is required, as there is no threat to the law and order situation as on date. Hence interference is declined and the writ petition is dismissed.
MANJULA CHELLUR, CHIEF JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
sj 24/06