IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2019 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR REVIEW PETITION NO.207 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9530 OF 2018 (GM-MM-S) Between:
M/s. Srivaru Stone Crushers Represented by its Partner Sri K.S. Balaram S/o Sheshappa Aged about 44 years Chowdeshwari Temple Road 4th Cross Road, Kunigal Town Kunigal Taluk Tumkuru District 572 102 (by Shri Keshava Reddy, M, Advocate) And:
1. The Government of Karnataka Represented by Principal Secretary …Review Petitioner Department of Commerce and Industries Vikasa Soudha Bengaluru 560 001 2. The Director of Mines and Geology Government of Karnataka Khanija Bhavan Race Course Road Bengaluru 560 001 3. The Competent Authority and Deputy Director Department of Mines and Geology No.2652/2667 Railway Station Road Gandhinagar Tumkuru 572 102 4. The District Task Force Committee Represented by its Member Secretary and Deputy Director Department of Mines and Geology No.2652/2667, Railway Station Road Gandhi Nagar Tumkuru 572 102 …Respondents (by Shri Vasanth V. Fernandes, AGA) This Review Petition is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying to review the order dated 21.03.2019 passed in Writ Petition No.9530 of 2018 and decide the matter by applying the ratio of the said Full Bench judgment.
This Review Petition coming on for orders this day, NARAYANA SWAMY J., made the following:
O R D E R This Review petition is filed seeking review of the order dated 21st Marcy, 2019 passed in Writ Petition No.9530 of 2018.
Heard the learned counsel for the Review Petitioner and the learned Additional Government Advocate.
2. Based on report of the revenue authorities that 128-07 acres of land is required for cattle grazing, keeping in view the population of cattle in the village, application of the petitioner for grant of quarry lease came to be rejected.
3. In the circumstances, there is no error found on the face of the record to review the order. Review Petition accordingly stands dismissed. Consequently, IA.I of 2019 filed seeking condonation of delay in filing the review petition also stands dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE akd* Sd/- JUDGE