Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Sriram Chauhan And Others vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|05 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4166 of 2021 Applicant :- Sriram Chauhan And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vinay Kumar Singh Chandel Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A for the State.
The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants, Sriram Chauhan, Suman Devi @ Smt. Suman Chauhan, Baburam Chauhan @ Rambabu, Bharat Chauhan and Ashok Kumar, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 458 of 2019 , under Sections- 406,420 I.P.C., Police Station- Sahjanwa, District- Gorakhpur , during pendency of trial.
The violation of contract of supply of labour has been alleged in the First Information Report.Learned counsel for the applicants alleges false implication.
Learned A.G.A. has pointed out that money has been transferred in the account of the applicants.
The allegations against the applicants show that they are involved in economic offences. The Apex Court in the case of Directorate of Enforcement Vs. Ashok Kumar Jain (1998) 2 SCC 105, has held that in economic offences, the accuseds are not entitled to anticipatory bail.
The anticipatory bail application is accordingly, rejected.
Order Date :- 5.4.2021 Atul kr. sri.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sriram Chauhan And Others vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
05 April, 2021
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Vinay Kumar Singh Chandel