Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Srinivasan vs Arulmighu Kailasanatha Temple

Madras High Court|18 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

No representation for the respondent. The learned counsel for the petitioner is present and made an endorsement indicating that the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.
2.In the light of the above position, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
To The First Additional District Munsif, Tiruchirappalli.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Srinivasan vs Arulmighu Kailasanatha Temple

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
18 September, 2017

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.