Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Srinivas Raju And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|13 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.52016 OF 2019 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN :
1. SRINIVAS RAJU S/O LATE NARAYANARAJU AGED 46 YEARS OCC: NIL 2. SRI. HANUMANTHARAJU S/O LATE NARAYANARAJU AGED 43 YEARS OCC: NIL BOTH ARE RESIDING AT GANIGARAHALLI VILLAGE CHIKKABAVANAVAR POST YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-560 023 (ORIGINAL PETITIONERS BEFORE THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION BENGALURU) … PETITIONERS (BY SMT. A. PUSHPA, ADVOCATE FOR SHRI. C.L. KOUJALAGI, ADVOCATE) AND :
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560 001 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB DIVISION BENGALURU-560 001 3. THE TAHASILDAR BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560 001 4. SRI. GANGARAJU S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS OCC: NIL 5. SRI. MANJUNATHARAJU S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS OCC: NIL 6. SRI. MUNIRAJU S/O LATE RAMAIH AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS OCC: NIL 7. SRI. RAVIKUMAR S/O LATE RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS OCC: NIL R4 TO R7 ARE RESIDING AT NO.18 GANIGARAHALLI VILLAGE CHIKKABAVANAVAR POST YESHWANTHAPURA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-560 023 (ORIGINAL RESPONDENTS NO.4 TO 7 BEFORE THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION BENGALURU) ... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI. Y.D. HARSHA, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO THE R-3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-C DTD.25.2.2019 ND ANNEXURE-D 6.5.2019.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Heard Smt. A.Pushpa, learned advocate for the petitioners and Shri Y.D.Harsha, learned AGA for the State.
2. Petitioners’ grievance is that request made in Annexures-C & D to enter their name in the revenue records has not been considered.
3. Learned AGA submits that petitioners’ request as per Annexures-C & D will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed by the Tahasildar, in accordance with law, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. His submission is placed on record.
Ordered accordingly. Petition disposed of.
No costs.
Sd/- JUDGE AV
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Srinivas Raju And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
13 December, 2019
Judges
  • P S Dinesh Kumar