Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mr Sridhar Subasri vs State Of Karnataka

High Court Of Karnataka|25 March, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.531/2018 BETWEEN:
MR.SRIDHAR SUBASRI, S/O S.P.S. SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC: MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT, R/O 128, SRILA HEIGHTS, EAST MARREDPALLI, SECUNDERABAD – 500 026, ANDHRA PRADESH.
(BY SRI.N.KUMAR, ADV.,) AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBI/BS & FC, BANGALORE – 560 001.
...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 31.08.2017 IN CRL.RP.NO.451/2017 PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES, BANGALORE AND ORDER DATED 04.02.2017 IN C.C.NO.9051/2006 PASSED BY THE XVII ADDL.C.M.M., BANGALORE (SPL.COURT FOR CBI CASES) AND DISCHARGE THE APPELLANT HEREIN IN C.C.NO.9051/2006.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER This petition having been filed on 10.10.2017, a memo came to be filed for conversion of Criminal Appeal into Criminal Petition, which was ordered on 30.10.2017. Thereafter, counsel for the petitioner has not rectified office objections despite sufficient time having been granted. Even cost imposed has not been paid by petitioner.
2. No representation on behalf of petitioner. It would indicate that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, petition is dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE TL
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mr Sridhar Subasri vs State Of Karnataka

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
25 March, 2019
Judges
  • Aravind Kumar